Internet-Draft SATP-vLEI September 2025
Smith Expires 8 March 2026 [Page]
Workgroup:
Secure Asset Transfer Protocol
Internet-Draft:
draft-smith-satp-vlei-binding-latest
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Author:
N. Smith
Independent

A SATP Core Binding for vLEI Identities

Abstract

The verifiable Legal Entity Identifier (vLEI) is a cryptographically verifiable extension of the LEI standard, designed to automate trust in organizational identity. Governed by the Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF), the vLEI system uses Authentic Chained Data Containers (ACDCs), Self-Addressing Identifiers (SAIDs), and Key Event Receipt Infrastructure (KERI) to issue and verify credentials for legal entities and their authorized representatives. It enables secure, machine-readable identity assertions across financial, regulatory, and supply chain ecosystems, supporting role-based delegation and interoperability with decentralized trust frameworks.

This specification defines vLEI for verifiable gateway operator identities and cryptographically links the gateway operator identity to the gateway identity. Thus SATP core lock assertions are cryptographically linked to gateway operator identities.

About This Document

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

The latest revision of this draft can be found at https://nedmsmith.github.io/draft-smith-satp-vlei-binding/draft-smith-satp-vlei-binding.html. Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-smith-satp-vlei-binding/.

Discussion of this document takes place on the Secure Asset Transfer Protocol Working Group mailing list (mailto:sat@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sat/. Subscribe at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sat/.

Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/nedmsmith/draft-smith-satp-vlei-binding.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 8 March 2026.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

The SATP architecture [I-D.ietf-satp-architecture] defines an interoperability architecture for interconnection between networks or systems that anticipates a secure asset transfer protocol that satisfies security, privacy, atomicity and liveliness requirements in the transfer of assets. The SATP core protocol [I-D.ietf-satp-core] is a protocol for exchanging digital assets that ensures the state of the asset is preserved across inter-domain transfers. It is an extensible protocol where fields containing identity and payload values that are not defined by SATP core may be defined by companion specifications. This specification defines a SATP core protocol binding for Verifiable Legal Entity Identifiers (vLEI) [ISO17442-3] used to identify SATP gateways and the organizations that operate them. In some use cases, the assets being transferred have legal considerations such that officers of the organization are expected to authorize digital asset transfers. This specification details the various vLEI credentials needed and how to integrate them with SATP core messages. SATP core message binding anticipates use of a message wrapper that uses media type [STD91] and content format [RFC7252] identifiers to facilitate interoperability with vLEI and other credential types.

2. Conventions and Definitions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. Architecture

The SATP core protocol [I-D.ietf-satp-core] defines several extensible protocol fields that contain identity and other values not defined by SATP core. To facilitate interoperability these fields SHOULD contain a media type [STD91] or content format [RFC7252] wrapper. This specation requests IANA assignment of media type and content format identifiers for vLEIs which are serialized as Composable Event Streaming Representation (CESR) [CESR-Spec] objects in JSON format. See Section 7.

3.1. SATP Messages Containing vLEI Credentials

The following SATP messages are extended to contain vLEI credentials:

Table 1: SATP messages containing vLEI and other credentials
# SATP Message Credential Type
1 verifiedOriginatorEntityId, verifiedBeneficiaryEntityId, senderGatewayOwnerId, receiverGatewayOwnerId LegalEntityvLEICredential
2 senderGatewayId, recipientGatewayId, senderGatewayNetworkId, recipientGatewayNetworkId LegalEntityEngagementContextRolevLEICredential
3 assetControllerCredential, lockEvidenceIssuerCredential, commitAuthorizingCredential LegalEntityvLEICredential, OfficialOrganizationalRolevLEICredential, LegalEntityEngagementContextRolevLEICredential
4 originatorPubkey, beneficiaryPubkey, senderGatewaySignaturePublicKey, receiverGatewaySignaturePublicKey, senderGatewayDeviceIdentityPubkey, receiverGatewayDeviceIdentityPubkey, lockEvidenceVerificationKey, commitVerificationKey, postCommitSecureChannelKey JOSE or COSE Key

The SATP Messages in row 4 of Table 1 SHALL be a JSON Web Key as defined by [RFC7517] or a COSE Key as defined by [STD96].

3.1.1. LegalEntityIdentityvLEICredential Credentials

The SATP Messages in row 1 of Table 1 SHALL be a LegalEntityvLEICredential as defined by the LEvLEIC schema.

These messages are realized using a Legal Entity vLEI Credential (LEvLEIC) because these message identify legal entities. Gateway owner identities area form of legal entity as they identify the owner of a gateway rather than the gateway itself.

3.1.2. LegalEntityEngagementContextRolevLEICredential Credentials

The SATP Messages in row 2 of Table 1 SHALL be a LegalEntityEngagementContextRolevLEICredential as defined by the LEECRvLEIC schema.

These messages are realized using a Legal Entity Engagement Context Role vLEI Credential (LEECRvLEIC) because these message identify the gateways and hosts within the respective networks involved in transferring digital assets.

3.1.3. OfficialOrganizationalRolevLEICredential Credentials

The SATP Messages in row 3 of Table 1 SHALL be one of a LegalEntityvLEICredential, LegalEntityEngagementContextRolevLEICredential, or OfficialOrganizationalRolevLEICredential as defined by the LEvLEIC, LEECRvLEIC, and LEOORvLEIC schemas.

These messages are realized using various vLEI credentials depending on use case context.

Examples:

  • LEvLEIC is used if an asset controller, lock evidence issuer, or commit authority are legal entities.

  • LEECRvLEIC is used if an asset controller, lock evidence issuer, or commit authority are machine hosts facilitating SATP gateways or network hosts.

  • Official Organizational Role vLEI Credential (OORvLEIC) is used if an asset controller, lock evidence issuer, or commit authority are organizational roles.

3.1.4. Key Structures

Keys embedded in hardware or firmware may not easily be converted to an interoperablel format, hence support for multiple key formats ensures the SATP protocols can be implemented by a wide variety of systems.

The SATP messages in row 4 of Table 1 SHALL be encoded using JSON Web Key (JWK) [RFC7517] or COSE key [STD96] formats.

The key structure SHOULD be extensible to support additional key formats.

3.2. SATP Message Wrapper Schema

The following CDDL [RFC8610] defines the wrapper and application to SATP fields.

; =====================================================================
; --- SATP Message (Entry Point) ---
; =====================================================================

satp-message = {
  ; --- Stage 1 ---
  ? verifiedOriginatorEntityId: wrapped-vlei ; always "leid"
  ? verifiedBeneficiaryEntityId: wrapped-vlei ; always "leid"
  ? senderGatewayOwnerId: wrapped-vlei ; always "leid"
  ? receiverGatewayOwnerId: wrapped-vlei ; always "leid"

  ? senderGatewayId: wrapped-vlei ; always "ecr"
  ? recipientGatewayId: wrapped-vlei ; always "ecr"
  ? senderGatewayNetworkId: wrapped-vlei ; always "ecr"
  ? recipientGatewayNetworkId: wrapped-vlei ; always "ecr"

  ? originatorPubkey: wrapped-key
  ? beneficiaryPubkey: wrapped-key
  ? senderGatewaySignaturePublicKey: wrapped-key
  ? receiverGatewaySignaturePublicKey: wrapped-key
  ? senderGatewayDeviceIdentityPubkey: wrapped-key
  ? receiverGatewayDeviceIdentityPubkey: wrapped-key

  ; --- Stage 2 ---
  ? assetControllerCredential: wrapped-vlei ; can be "leid", "ecr" or "oor"
  ? lockEvidenceIssuerCredential: wrapped-vlei ; can be "leid", "ecr" or "oor"
  ? lockEvidenceVerificationKey: wrapped-key

  ; --- Stage 3 ---
  ? commitAuthorizingCredential: wrapped-vlei ; can be "leid", "ecr" or "oor"
  ? commitVerificationKey: wrapped-key
  ? postCommitSecureChannelKey: wrapped-key
}

; =====================================================================
; --- Wrapped vLEI Payloads ---
; =====================================================================

wrapped-vlei = {
 vleitype: tstr
 content: content-ref
 payload: bstr / tstr
}

content-ref = {
 ? mt: tstr ; TBA e.g., "application/acdc+json"
 ? cf: uint ; TBA content format id
 ? cbt: bool ; payload contains CBOR tagged content in the TN() range if true
 ? oid: tstr ; generated from content-format-id e.g., "1.3.6.1.4.1.37476.2.1.5"
}

; =====================================================================
; --- Wrapped Key Definitions ---
; =====================================================================

wrapped-key = $key-type
$key-type /= cose-key
$key-type /= jwk-key
$key-type /= pkix-key

$wrapped-key-content /= "application/cose;cose-type=cose-key"
$wrapped-key-content /= "application/jwk+json"
$wrapped-key-content /= "application/pkix-cert"
$wrapped-key-content /= uint

cose-key = {
 content: "application/cose;cose-type=cose-key" / uint,
 encoding: "cbor" / "base64",
 payload: bstr / tstr
}

jwk-key = {
  content: "application/jwk+json" / uint,
  payload: tstr
}

pkix-key = {
  content: "application/pkix-cert" / uint,
  encoding: "PEM" / "DER",
  payload: tstr / bstr
}

3.3. vLEI Media Types

vLEI credentials are expressed as Authentic Chained Data Containers (ACDC) [ACDC-Spec]. Section Section 7 request IANA assignment of ACDC media types [STD91].

SATP messages as JSON can contain JSON wrapped ACDCs, but other ACDC formats are possible. The follwing media types MAY be used when supplying ACDC credential payloads:

Table 2: vLEI media types
Media Types
application/acdc+json
application/acdc+cbor
application/acdc+msgpk
application/acdc+cesr
application/said+cesr
Table 3: vLEI profiles
Profile name Profile ID
Legal Entity Identity (LEI‑ID) ;profile="urn:vlei:lei-id"
Engagement Context Role (ECR) ;profile="urn:vlei:ecr"
Official Organizational Role (OOR) ;profile="urn:vlei:oor"
Legal Entity Authorizing Role (LAR) ;profile="urn:vlei:lar"
Qualified vLEI Issuer (QVI) ;profile="urn:vlei:qvi"
vLEI Root Authority (vRA) ;profile="urn:vlei:vra"

The various vLEI credential types can be specified in a media type using the profile option. Table 3 summarizes the profile identifiers for the various vLEI credential types. A comprehensive listing of vLEI profiles is provided even though some of the vLEI credential types are not anticipated by the vLEI binding to SATP at this time.

3.4. Example SATP Credential Payload

The following SATP wrapper examples show synthetic vLEI data:

{
  "verifiedOriginatorEntityId": {
    "vleitype": "verified-originator-entity-id",
    "content": {
      "mt": "application/acdc+json;profile=urn:vlei:leid"
      // JSON serialization of an ACDC credential (LEID profile)
      // CESR framing in plain text, not CBOR
    },
    "payload": "ACDC10JSON...SAID...i:did:keri:..."
    // literal CESR/ACDC JSON text, not base64
  }
}

{
  "verifiedBeneficiaryEntityId": {
    "vleitype": "verified-beneficiary-entity-id",
    "content": {
      "mt": "application/said+cbor;profile=urn:vlei:leid;base64=true",
      "cbt": false // no TN() CBOR tag; payload is base64 of raw CBOR
    },
    "payload": "QUNEQzEwQ0JPUkJhc2U2NEVuY29kZWQvLi4u"
    // base64 of binary CBOR serialization of SAID credential (LEID profile)
  }
}

{
  "senderGatewayOwnerId": {
    "vleitype": "sender-gateway-owner-id",
    "content": {
      "mt": "application/acdc+msgpk;profile=urn:vlei:leid"
      // cf, cbt, oid omitted here — optional in schema
    },
    "payload": "ACDC10MSGP...SAID...i:did:keri:..."
    // MessagePack serialization of an ACDC credential (LEID profile)
  }
}
{
  "receiverGatewayOwnerId": {
    "vleitype": "leid", // always "leid" for this field
    "content": {
      "mt": "application/said+cesr;profile=urn:vlei:leid;base64=true"
      // could also include cf, cbt, oid if known
    },
    "payload": "QUNEQzEwQ0VTUkJhc2U2NEVuY29kZWQvLi4u"
    // ⟶ Base64 of binary CESR stream encoding of SAID credential
  }
}

{
  "senderGatewayId": {
    "vleitype": "sender-gateway-id",
    "content": {
      "mt": "application/acdc+cesr;profile=urn:vlei:ecr"
      // cf, cbt, oid omitted — optional in schema
    },
    "payload": "ACDC10CESR...SAID...i:did:keri:..."
    // CESR-encoded ACDC credential (ECR profile) as plain text
  }
}


{
  "recipientGatewayId": {
    "vleitype": "recipient-gateway-id",
    "content": {
      "mt": "application/acdc+cbor;profile=urn:vlei:ecr", // from vlei-media-type enum
      "cf": 0,
      "oid": "1.2.3.4.6" // actual OID for this credential type
    },
    "payload": "ACDC10CBORTESTSAIDi:did:keri:EXAMPLERGWNETID"
    // raw CBOR bytes or base64/base64url string, but not CBOR-tagged
  }
}

{
  "senderGatewayNetworkId": {
    "vleitype": "sender-gateway-network-id",
    "content": {
      "mt": "application/acdc+cbor;profile=urn:vlei:ecr;base64=true",
      "cbt": false // no TN() CBOR tag; just base64 of raw CBOR
    },
    "payload": "oWJ0ZXN0LWVjci1jcmVkZW50aWFs..."
    // base64 of the CBOR-encoded ACDC (ECR profile)
  }
}

{
  "senderGatewayNetworkId": {
    "vleitype": "sender-gateway-network-id",
    "content": {
      "mt": "application/acdc+cbor;profile=urn:vlei:ecr;base64=true",
      "cbt": false
    },
    "payload": "gEEBAQ..."
    // base64 of CBOR-encoded ACDC (ECR profile)
  }
}

The following SATP wrapper examples show synthetic key data:

{
  "originatorPubkey": {
    "content": "application/jwk+json",
    "payload": "{ \"kty\": \"EC\", \"crv\": \"P-256\", \"x\": \"...\", \"y\": \"...\" }"
  },
  "beneficiaryPubkey": {
    "content": "application/cose;cose-type=cose-key",
    "encoding": "base64", // explicitly flagging representation
    "payload": "aEtNQnBRLi4u" // base64 of CBOR COSE_Key bytes
  },
  "senderGatewaySignaturePublicKey": {
    "content": "application/jwk+json",
    "payload": "{ \"kty\": \"RSA\", \"n\": \"...\", \"e\": \"AQAB\" }"
  },
  "receiverGatewaySignaturePublicKey": {
    "content": "application/cose;cose-type=cose-key",
    "encoding": "base64",
    "payload": "aEtNQ3BBLi4u"
  },
  "senderGatewayDeviceIdentityPubkey": {
    "content": "application/pkix-cert",
    "encoding": "PEM",
    "payload": "-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----\nMIIB...==\n-----END CERTIFICATE-----"
  },
  "receiverGatewayDeviceIdentityPubkey": {
    "content": "application/pkix-cert",
    "encoding": "DER",
    "payload": "MIIB..." // base64 DER
  },
  "lockEvidenceVerificationKey": {
    "content": "application/jwk+json",
    "payload": "{ \"kty\": \"OKP\", \"crv\": \"Ed25519\", \"x\": \"...\" }"
  },
  "commitVerificationKey": {
    "content": "application/cose;cose-type=cose-key",
    "encoding": "base64",
    "payload": "aEtNQ3BBLi4u"
  },
  "postCommitSecureChannelKey": {
    "content": "application/jwk+json",
    "payload": "{ \"kty\": \"EC\", \"crv\": \"P-384\", \"x\": \"...\", \"y\": \"...\" }"
  }
}



4. Identities

5. Verification of vLEI Payloads

6. Security Considerations

TODO Security

7. IANA Considerations

7.1. Media Type Registration: application/acdc+json

Type name:

application

Subtype name:

acdc+json

Required parameters:

None

Optional parameters:

profile — Indicates the credential conforms to a specific schema registry (e.g., "vlei")

base64 — Indicates the CESR stream is base64-encoded for transport in JSON wrappers

charset — Optional; default is UTF-8

Encoding considerations:

8bit; CESR text encoding is UTF-8 compatible and self-framing.

When base64=true, the CESR stream is base64-encoded for safe embedding in JSON.

Security considerations:

CESR payloads are cryptographically signed and self-framing.

Signature verification is required to ensure authenticity and integrity.

Schema SAIDs must be validated against the GLEIF vLEI Credential Schema Registry.

Credential provenance must be anchored to the GLEIF Root AID via ACDC edges.

Interoperability considerations:

CESR supports dual text-binary encoding; this media type assumes CESR text encoding.

When base64=true, payloads are safely embeddable in JSON-based SATP wrappers.

Compatible with SATP, ACDC, and KERI protocols.

Published specification:

Composable Event Streaming Representation (CESR) — draft-ssmith-cesr-03

GLEIF vLEI Credential Schema Registry — GLEIF Registry PDF

Applications that use this media type:

GLEIF vLEI issuance and verification systems

SATP-compliant credential exchange platforms

Forensic credential chaining and audit systems

Fragment identifier considerations:

None

Additional information:

Magic number(s): None

File extension(s): .cesrj

Macintosh file type code(s): None

Person & email address to contact for further information:

N. Smith spec-author@example.org

GLEIF IT Team vlei-support@gleif.org

Intended usage:

COMMON

Author:

TBD, GLEIF IT Team

Change controller:

IETF / GLEIF

8. References

8.1. Normative References

[REQ-LEVEL]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[I-D.ietf-satp-core]
Hargreaves, M., Hardjono, T., Belchior, R., Ramakrishna, V., and A. Chiriac, "Secure Asset Transfer Protocol (SATP) Core", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-satp-core-11, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-satp-core-11>.
[RFC7159]
Bray, T., Ed., "The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format", RFC 7159, DOI 10.17487/RFC7159, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7159>.
[RFC7517]
Jones, M., "JSON Web Key (JWK)", RFC 7517, DOI 10.17487/RFC7517, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7517>.
[RFC2585]
Housley, R. and P. Hoffman, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Operational Protocols: FTP and HTTP", RFC 2585, DOI 10.17487/RFC2585, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2585>.
[STD96]
Schaad, J., "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Structures and Process", STD 96, RFC 9052, DOI 10.17487/RFC9052, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9052>.
[STD91]
Freed, N., Klensin, J., and T. Hansen, "Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 6838, DOI 10.17487/RFC6838, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6838>.
[RFC7252]
Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., and C. Bormann, "The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)", RFC 7252, DOI 10.17487/RFC7252, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7252>.
[RFC8610]
Birkholz, H., Vigano, C., and C. Bormann, "Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures", RFC 8610, DOI 10.17487/RFC8610, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8610>.
[GLEIF-vLEI-TechReq-Part1]
Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation, "Technical Requirements Part 1: KERI Infrastructure", GLEIF vLEI-EGF-TechReq-Part1-v1.3, , <https://www.gleif.org/organizational-identity/introducing-the-verifiable-lei-vlei/introducing-the-vlei-ecosystem-governance-framework/2025-04-16_vlei-egf-v3.0-technical-requirements-part-1-keri-infrastructure-2024_v1.3_final.pdf>.
[GLEIF-vLEI-TechReq-Part2]
Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation, "Technical Requirements Part 2: vLEI Credentials", GLEIF vLEI-EGF-TechReq-Part2-v1.1, , <https://www.gleif.org/en/vlei/introducing-the-vlei-ecosystem-governance-framework>.
[GLEIF-vLEI-TechReq-Part3]
Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation, "Technical Requirements Part 3: vLEI Credential Schema Registry", GLEIF vLEI-EGF-TechReq-Part3-v1.1, , <https://www.gleif.org/en/vlei/introducing-the-vlei-ecosystem-governance-framework>.
[ISO17442-3]
International Organization for Standardization, "Financial services — Legal entity identifier (LEI) — Part 3: Verifiable LEIs (vLEIs)", ISO 17442-3:2024, , <https://www.iso.org/standard/85628.html>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.

8.2. Informative References

[I-D.ietf-satp-architecture]
Hardjono, T., Hargreaves, M., Smith, N., and V. Ramakrishna, "Secure Asset Transfer (SAT) Interoperability Architecture", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-satp-architecture-08, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-satp-architecture-08>.
[ISO17442-1]
International Organization for Standardization, "Financial services — Legal entity identifier (LEI) — Part 1: Assignment", ISO 17442-1:2020, , <https://www.iso.org/standard/59771.html>.
[KERI-Spec]
Trust Over IP Foundation, "Key Event Receipt Infrastructure (KERI) Specification, v0.9, Draft", TOIP TSWG-KERI-2023, , <https://trustoverip.github.io/tswg-keri-specification/>.
[ACDC-Spec]
Trust Over IP Foundation, "Authentic Chained Data Containers (ACDC) Specification, v0.9, Draft", TOIP TSWG-ACDC-2023, , <https://trustoverip.github.io/tswg-acdc-specification>.
[CESR-Spec]
Trust Over IP Foundation, "Composable Event Streaming Representation (CESR) Proof Format Specification, v0.9, Draft", TOIP TSWG-CESR-2023, , <https://trustoverip.github.io/tswg-cesr-specification/>.
[GLEIF-vLEI-EGF]
Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation, "Verifiable LEI (vLEI) Ecosystem Governance Framework: Primary and Controlled Documents", GLEIF vLEI-EGF-v3.0, , <https://www.gleif.org/en/vlei/introducing-the-vlei-ecosystem-governance-framework>.

Acknowledgments

TODO acknowledge.

Author's Address

Ned Smith
Independent